CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”
  • 微信订阅号
  • 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊 (中国科技论文统计源期刊)

1982—2022年海岸带景观研究进展与启示

邵钰涵, 孟钰, 殷雨婷

邵钰涵,孟钰,殷雨婷.1982—2022年海岸带景观研究进展与启示[J].风景园林,2023,30(5):10-18.
引用本文: 邵钰涵,孟钰,殷雨婷.1982—2022年海岸带景观研究进展与启示[J].风景园林,2023,30(5):10-18.
SHAO Y H, MENG Y, YIN Y T. Achievements and Implications of the Research on Landscape in Coastal Zone from 1982 to 2022[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(5): 10-18.
Citation: SHAO Y H, MENG Y, YIN Y T. Achievements and Implications of the Research on Landscape in Coastal Zone from 1982 to 2022[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(5): 10-18.

1982—2022年海岸带景观研究进展与启示

基金项目: 教育部生态化重点实验室项目“恢复性城市分实验中心”(编号 CAUP-UD-06);中国科技部外国专家项目“恢复性城市景观理论、方法与实践研究”(编号 G2022133023L);上海市“超级博士后”资助项目“城市绿色空间社会效益调控机制研究——以上海市中心城区为例”(编号 2021357);上海市城市设计与城市科学重点实验室上海纽约大学2022年开放课题“城市小微绿地疗愈效能智慧化增效提质研究——以上海市口袋公园为例”(编号 2022YTYin_LOUD)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    邵钰涵/女/博士/同济大学建筑与城市规划学院副教授、博士生导师/教育部生态化城市设计国际合作联合实验室恢复性城市研究分实验中心主任/本刊特约编辑/研究方向为体验性景观设计与恢复性城市主义、海岸景观与环境规划

    孟钰/女/同济大学建筑与城市规划学院在读硕士研究生/研究方向为海岸带景观识别与评估、恢复性景观规划与设计

    殷雨婷/女/同济大学建筑与城市规划学院博士后/教育部生态化城市设计国际合作联合实验室恢复性城市研究分实验中心副主任/研究方向为疗愈性城市环境、多维度景观感知评价、社会恢复性城市主义

    通讯作者:

    殷雨婷, yyin0326@tongji.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TU981

Achievements and Implications of the Research on Landscape in Coastal Zone from 1982 to 2022

More Information
    Author Bio:

    SHAO Yuhan, Ph.D., is an associate professor and doctoral supervisor in the College of Architecture and Urban Planning (CAUP), Tongji University, director of Restorative Urbanism Research Center (RURC), Joint Laboratory for International Cooperation on Eco-Urban Design, and a contributing editor of this journal. Her research focuses on theory and technology of landscape architecture, planning and design of social restorative landscape, and landscape in coastal zone

    MENG Yu is a master student in the College of Architecture and Urban Planning (CAUP), Tongji University. Her research focuses on identification and assessment of landscape in coastal zone, and planning and design of restorative landscape

    YIN Yuting, Ph.D., is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Architecture and Urban Planning (CAUP), Tongji University, associate director of Restorative Urbanism Research Center (RURC), Joint Laboratory for International Cooperation on Eco-Urban Design. Her research focuses on restorative landscape design and multi-dimensional landscape perception evaluation

    Corresponding author:

    YIN Yuting, yyin0326@tongji.edu.cn

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    在陆海统筹思想推动下,中国海岸带景观研究进入蓬勃发展期,亟须对既有中外相关研究展开系统梳理,以明确未来研究的核心方向和重点需求。

    方法 

    基于计算机深度学习的语义识别技术,对1 000余篇国内外海岸带景观文献进行主题聚类和深度分析,厘清海岸带景观研究在过去40年的发展历程。

    结果 

    学界关注热点由海岸带景观在应对气候变化、维持生态系统稳定等刚需问题上的重要作用,逐步拓展为在人本导向发展路径下对海岸带景观自然生态、经济文化和景观风貌等价值的关注,并提炼出三大趋势性变化。

    结论 

    据此,未来中国海岸带景观研究首先需要切实回应全球气候变化所带来的问题;其次应重视海岸带景观风貌与空间品质,注重保护和凸显景观地方性,打造符合人本需求的高品质海岸带空间;此外,还应从理论和实践上同步推进陆海统筹研究成果的融合应用和规划管理机制的协同落地,有序推动海岸带可持续发展这一长期目标的实现。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    The coastal zone is where terrestrial and marine environments mutually interact. The research on landscape in coastal zone can be traced back to the 1980s, with early researchers being dominated by American and Australian scholars. After the year 2010, China also entered a period of rapid development in relevant academic arenas. It is believed that coastal zone will continue to play a critical role in coping with climate change, maintaining ecological pattern, activating land-sea interaction, presenting landscape identity, and sustaining urban public life. China has a long coastline of over 33,000 kilometers, which has obvious features and great potential for future development. Driven by the rise of land-sea integration, the implementation of territorial spatial planning and the complete ban on offshore aquaculture, the research on landscape in coastal zone in China has therefore entered a new stage that especially emphasizes the ecological, economic, cultural and aesthetic values of landscape in coastal zone. It is now necessary to conduct a systematic review of domestic and foreign researches in the past 40 years, so as to clarify the core direction and key needs of future research.

    Methods 

    By the semantic segmentation technology based on deep learning, this research conducts a thematic cluster analysis and in-depth reading analysis of over 1,000 domestic and foreign literature on related topics, which are mainly selected from China National Knowledge Network (CNKI) and Web of Science (WoS) using keywords “coastal landscape”, with 820 English literature and 186 Chinese literature being identified closely related. Due to a large amount of literature selected, the research firstly sorts, classifies and summarizes the key themes in existing evidence based on semantic segmentation and cluster analysis, and then adopts the documental analysis method to discuss the development history, trends and hot topics of the research on landscape in coastal zone based on the results of thematic cluster analysis.

    Results 

    The results of cluster analysis suggest that foreign literature can roughly be classified into two levels of themes. Level-I themes include the three categories of ecological protection, planning and design management, and model and method research. The category of ecological protection can be further divided into three sub-categories: disaster prevention, landscape ecological pattern and ecological protection and management. The category of planning and design management can also be divided into three sub-categories: urban development, landscape character and landscape perception. There is no secondary classification of model and method research. Thus, there is a total of six Level-II themes for English literature. The classification results of Chinese literature also show that there are two levels of themes. Level-I themes are the same as English literature, while there is a total of 12 Level-II themes: landscape ecology, disaster prevention, coastal zone management, landscape character, public space, coastal tourism and resource, coastal urban development, design and strategy, land-sea integration, coastal zone culture, and landscape resource evaluation and protection. In addition, it is found that over the past 40 years, the focus of the research on landscape in coastal zone years have been shifted from coping with urgent issues such as climate change and maintaining ecosystem stability to preserving the natural ecology and the economic, cultural and landscape values of coastal zones in response to the human-oriented paradigm. In general, there are three obvious development trends. First, coastal zone resilience, ecological pattern and conservation management have become research hotspots since the 1980s and have developed steadily ever since. They will continue to be the core topics in the field of landscape in coastal zone for a long time, and a sound theoretical and practical basis has been formed for relevant research. Besides, the protection and spatial quality optimization of landscape in coastal zone have become emerging focuses with the development of human-oriented paradigm, but to date, most of them are theoretical attempts with only a few countries trying to incorporate them into practical planning and management. In addition, territorial spatial planning led by the idea of land-sea integration has been studied intensively after 2012 and soon became an essential part of the research system for sustainable development of coastal zone. However, a unified and complete theoretical framework has not yet been established and all related efforts are still in the initial stage.

    Conclusion 

    Through a discussion-based review, this research identifies underlying tendency changes and proposes future development paths for the research on landscape in coastal zone in China. To sum up, the research on landscape in coastal zone in China should actively respond to the global crisis of climate change and explore the characteristics of a reasonable development path that is in line with local development needs in the future. Research results suggest that the problems caused by global climate change should be put in the first place. Also, the protection and prominence of local landscape characters should be preserved to better serve the needs of creating high-quality coastal spaces. In addition, the theoretical and practical application of land-sea integration strategy should be promoted simultaneously to achieve the long-term goal of sustainable coastal development.

  • 江宁区位于南京市东南部(图 1),域内地形地貌类型丰富,具有典型亚热带北部气候与植被特征。江宁区西北部为长江及其沿岸湿地,东北及西南地势较高,有近400座低山分布,整体地貌主要以丘陵、岗地为主[1],其中,东北片区的山体呈北东走势,山体连续性高且较为陡峭;西南部山体体量较大,夹杂部分缓坡地带,低山丘陵地带植被覆盖度较高,主要为亚热带针叶林和落叶阔叶林;中部地势较低,主要为适宜耕作的平原。南京市的发展对乡村及其生态环境不可避免地产生了一定影响,江宁区作为南京都市边缘地带,随着城镇建设和农业生产对土地的改造,自然的生态本底被扰动、生态环境被改变,生境的脆弱性和生物多样性保护成为亟待解决的问题。

    图  1  南京市江宁区地理区位
    Figure  1.  Geographical location of Jiangning District, Nanjing

    过往从形态学角度探讨乡村生态问题的研究,存在就形态论生态的间接性;而专注从生态学角度开展的乡村研究,往往又淡化了乡村三生空间融合的基本特征,因此在生态源地、廊道及节点的识别中存在着不确定性。本研究聚焦南京市江宁区的用地构成与生境质量,并在国土空间规划语境下,结合三生空间与生境的分布特征,探索区域生态环境保护和城乡建设持续发展的依据,旨在探索高速城市化背景下城郊乡村生态环境与生物多样性保护的科学途径。

    本研究以定量为基础、以定位为抓手,在此基础上生成定性决策的研究思路,探讨江宁区乡村生境空间的识别、保护与规划。首先,通过对江宁区的土地覆被类型进行遥感解译,分析三生空间及生境类型分布状况;其次,融合生态与形态因素,综合运用形态学空间格局分析(morphological spatial pattern analysis, MSPA)方法(聚焦景观形态)和InVEST模型(聚焦生境质量),并结合三生空间与生境类型提取生态源地;再次,利用ArcGIS的栅格计算器运算得到研究区内的综合生态阻力面,运用ArcGIS的Linkage Mapper工具箱识别生态廊道、夹点、障碍点,形成由生态源地、源间生态廊道、生态节点构成的多层级生态网络。在此基础上探讨以乡村生物多样性保护为目标的空间优化策略(图 2)。

    图  2  乡村生态景观识别与生境网络优化途径
    Figure  2.  Approach for rural ecological landscape identification and habitat network optimization

    三生空间分别对应了乡村的3种主要用地类型,同时也反映了不同用地的生境特征,采用遥感影像解译识别三生空间及生境类型分布,是认知乡村生态景观的基础。

    依托于自然,农业生产与人类生活共同融合的乡村生态环境逐渐形成,具有明显的复合性和镶嵌性特征。不同的景观单元对于生物多样性具有不同的影响,其中,耕地作为人工植被景观,具有生产的功能属性,但由于植被类型单一,其间的野生物种较少;自然山林区域则具有良好的生态本底和较丰富的物种多样性。本研究以空间分辨率为10 m的Sentinel-2A遥感影像数据作为原始数据,利用eCognition平台的最邻近监督分类法解译江宁区的地表覆被类型,将下垫面分为林地、草地、建设用地、耕地、裸地、水域6个类型,识别江宁区的三生空间类型分布特征(图 3),其中,生态空间主要分布于以丘陵地貌为主的云台山、牛首山、方山、青龙山、汤山区域,其植被覆盖度较高,是生态保育的重要空间;生活空间主要集中分布在地势较为平坦的中部平原区域以及长江沿岸区域,其中村镇居民点主要位于南部及东北部区域,且呈分散式分布;耕地、鱼塘等农业生产空间与村镇居民点呈镶嵌式分布,多位于西北的南山湖与云台山之间、溧水河沿岸以西、句容河沿岸等区域,3类空间共同形成了江宁区乡村三生空间融合的景观格局。

    图  3  江宁区三生空间类型识别结果
    Figure  3.  Identification results of the types of ecological, production and living spaces in Jiangning District

    江宁区生境类型可分为人工生境、半自然生境、自然生境3种(图 4)。其中,1)人工生境主要包括建设用地(532.42 km2)、裸地(99.03 km2)、部分草地以及人工坑塘、水库等。建设用地受人为活动的扰动较大,主要分布于江宁街道西北区域、谷里街道西北区域、秣陵街道、东山街道西南区域、禄口街道西北区域、汤山街道东南区域,裸地分布较为零散,鲜有植被覆盖,生物多样性较低。2)半自然生境主要包括145 km2耕地,多分布于西部和南部的山地周边平原以及中部和东南部平原地带。3)自然生境则主要包括长江、秦淮河、溧水河、句容河等水域及其沿岸湿地以及林地,林地主要集中分布于云台山及西北部青龙山、汤山及周边区域,另有部分林地零散分布于东南部及中部。自然及人工林地具有良好的生态本底,有利于生物多样性保护,可以作为生境网络中的生态源地。研究区域内的林地面积共计582.78 km2,草地面积共计40.59 km2,水域面积共计164.01 km2

    图  4  江宁区生境类型识别结果
    Figure  4.  Distribution of ecological, production and living space types in Jiangning District

    为了科学地梳理生境网络,需要提取与识别江宁区生态景观中包括生态源地、生态廊道、生态节点在内的关键地段,其中生态源地是最关键的要素。

    MSPA方法常被用于生态网络研究,根据图像学原理识别不同土地利用类型,通过区分以自然要素为组成的“前景”与以非自然要素为组成的“背景”,可识别大型且连续的自然斑块(核心区)作为生态源地,利用此方法能从形态上提取生态源地的边界。生态源地作为多种乡土物种的栖息地,宜为面积较大且较为完整、生境质量较高的斑块,然而MSPA方法是从形态间接反映生态状况,无法直接判断景观斑块生境质量。因此,利用能够评价生境质量的InVEST模型评估各“核心区”的生境质量,可以弥补用MSPA方法进行生态源地提取的不足。

    本研究首先运用MSPA方法提取有潜力成为生态源地的“核心区”,再采用InVEST模型评价江宁区的整体生境质量,进而计算各“核心区”的生境质量平均值并进行排序,同时结合三生空间的识别结果选取生态源地。

    对于江宁区而言,将林地、草地、耕地、水域作为前景,建设用地、裸地作为背景,并最终将前景要素识别为核心区、孤岛区、环岛区、桥接区、孔隙区、边缘区、支线7种模式[2-5],其中,核心区可作为生态网络中的潜力源地。运用InVEST生境质量评价模型,基于江宁区土地覆被数据的解译结果,设置耕地、建设用地和裸地为威胁源,参考相关研究及模型推荐值[6-9],分别设置3种威胁源的最大影响范围、权重及衰减模式(表 1),求得江宁区生境质量评价结果(图 5)。

    表  1  威胁源的权重及影响范围设置
    Table  1.  Weight and influence scope of threat sources
    威胁源 最大影响范围/km 权重 衰减模式
    耕地 8 0.4 线性
    建设用地 10 0.9 指数
    裸地 9 0.7 线性
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    图  5  MSPA景观空间分布
    Figure  5.  Spatial distribution of MSPA landscape

    利用MSPA方法识别的景观空间分布结果(图 5)显示,核心区较多分布于水域、自然山林地带,较为完整的斑块主要集中于西南部、东北部,主要生态核心区域连通度较低。InVEST模型的生境质量评价结果(图 6)显示,江宁区生境质量的平均值为0~0.997不等,生境质量比较高且区域面积较大斑块主要集中在西南部云台山、中部汤山方山国家地质公园、东北部汤山风景区的林地处,其余生境质量较高的斑块为散布在江宁区内的林地,其次为耕地和水域,城镇建设用地和裸地的生境质量比较低。利用ArcGIS中的分区统计工具,选择面积>3 km2的核心区斑块,统计每个核心区斑块的生境质量栅格数据平均值并对其进行排序(图 7),提取生境质量的平均值>0.7且主要以生态空间为主的核心区斑块作为生态源地,共计9个,空间上形成分散式布局,且其尺度、类型各异。

    图  6  生境质量空间分布
    Figure  6.  Spatial distribution of habitat quality
    图  7  面积大于3 km2的核心区生境质量空间分布
    Figure  7.  Spatial distribution of habitat quality in core areas larger than 3 km2

    生态廊道与生态节点的提取通常建立在提取生态源地的基础上,常用方法有基于图论的最小累积阻力(minimum cumulative resistance, MCR)模型、电路理论等。MCR模型基于ArcGIS平台,通过计算源地之间的最小累积成本距离识别生态廊道,进一步将各廊道交点作为生态节点,以整合生境网络,但MCR模型并不能进一步识别“生态障碍点”“生态夹点”等具体类型的生态节点。而基于电路理论开发的ArcGIS平台的Linkage Mapper工具箱可以解决上述问题,其中包含Linkage Pathways、Pinchpoint Mapper、Barrier Mapper工具及Circuitscape程序[10-11]。Linkage Mapper工具箱以生态阻力面、生态源地作为源数据,通过模拟电子在电路中的随机游走过程预测生物的移动,以生态源地作为生态流的原点、生态阻力面反映生态流遇到的阻力,可以识别出生态廊道、生态障碍点、生态夹点,突破了MCR模型的局限性,因此而得以广泛使用。

    运用Linkage Pathways工具识别促进生态源地间连通性的复合走廊作为生态廊道;Pinchpoint Mapper工具通过调用Circuitscape程序识别生物移动过程中经过概率或频率较高的生态夹点区域;运用Barrier Mapper工具则可识别出位于廊道附近对生物活动和移动阻力较大的生态障碍点区域。

    识别生态廊道首先需要进行生态阻力面的构建,选取对生物多样性影响较大的土地覆被类型(图 8-1)、路网密度(图 8-2)、坡度(图 8-3)作为权重叠加因子,并从生物多样性保护角度,对各类阻力因子进行赋值(表 2)和计算。其中,土地覆被类型作为对生物多样性影响最为显著的因子,赋予其0.5权重,受人为扰动越小的下垫面组分类型,其生态阻力越小,赋值越低;路网密度作为能够响应人为建设强度的因子、坡度作为能反映生态敏感性的因子,二者均对区域的生态阻力值有一定的影响,对路网密度与坡度因子均赋予0.25权重,利用自然间断点分级法,对路网密度、坡度值从低到高的区域依次赋值1至5,可得出江宁区生态阻力面构建结果(图 9)。

    图  8  生态阻力面叠加因子
    8-1 土地覆被因子
    8-2 路网密度因子
    8-3 坡度因子
    Figure  8.  Ecological resistance surface overlaying factor
    Land cover factor
    Road network density factor
    Slope factor
    表  2  生态阻力面各因子赋值及权重
    Table  2.  Values and weights of each factor of ecological resistance surface
    阻力因子 权重 赋值
    1 2 3 4 5
    土地覆被类型 0.50 林地 草地、水域 耕地 裸地 建设用地
    路网密度 0.25 0~0.74 0.75~1.99 2.00~3.77 3.78~6.57 6.58~16.26
    坡度 0.25 0~2.72 2.73~6.92 6.93~13.10 13.11~20.76 20.77~63.02
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    图  9  生态阻力面构建结果
    Figure  9.  Results of ecological resistance surface construction

    进一步利用ArcGIS软件平台的Linkage Mapper工具箱中的Linkage Pathways工具,以生态源地和生态阻力面为源数据,生成源地之间生物流和能量流的低阻廊道,最终选出17条源间生态廊道(图 10)。

    图  10  江宁区生态关键地段识别结果
    Figure  10.  Identification results of ecological key areas in Jiangning District

    生态夹点在空间上分布于生态源地附近以及源间生态廊道交集处,是生物移动过程中的关键区域。利用ArcGIS平台的Pinchpoint Mapper工具进行江宁区生态夹点的识别,按照电流密度值可划分出4个一级夹点与8个二级夹点(图 10)。结合遥感卫星影像,根据江宁区夹点区域的景观特征,可将其分为生态空间类、生活与生产空间类、空闲地与裸土地类。其中,生态空间类主要以自然生态的蓝绿空间为主;生活与生产空间类主要包括村镇居住用地、鱼塘、耕地、水渠等人类生活和农业生产空间;空闲地与裸土地类主要包括一些裸地与未利用地等。

    生态障碍点是生物迁徙和移动过程中遇到阻力较大的区域,识别生态障碍点并进行人为干预,通过调整用地、恢复植被等措施可以修复并有效增强区域的景观连通性。利用ArcGIS平台的Barrier Mapper工具在已有廊道的基础上,进行江宁区生态障碍点区域的识别,同时依据卫星影像,根据其用地类型和地物特征将识别后的13个生态障碍点(图 10)分为居住用地类、农业设施建设用地类、空闲地与裸地类、交通运输及工业用地类。

    乡村生态景观和生境网络的整合和优化需要建立在三生空间协同的基础上,当现状用地与生态关键地段存在冲突与矛盾时,需要严格保护基本农田范围及生态红线。须根据乡村生态景观关键生态地段的识别结果,保护并维系生态源地,以生态廊道连通各源地,并修复生态节点从而加强生态廊道的连通性。对于识别出的生态夹点和生态障碍点两类生态节点:将生态夹点作为生态保护点,在合理控制开发强度的基础上,保留其生态属性或者改善节点的生境质量,将生态障碍点作为生态恢复点,对生态恢复点应采取保留、改善、重建3种措施,以加强区域生境连通度。初步整合出江宁区四片区-五组团-多廊道-多节点的多层级复合式生境网络格局,共识别出生态源地共计9个、生态廊道共计17条、生态保护点12个、生态恢复点13个。对生境网络中的各生态廊道及生态节点进行编号(图 11)。

    图  11  江宁区生境网络整合结果
    Figure  11.  Results of habitat network integration in Jiangning District

    依据江宁区下垫面的景观特征,可将生态源地分为生态湿地类、自然山林类、郊野公园类3种:1)以河道湿地为主的西北地带长江处的生态湿地类作为多种生物的栖息地,需要充分保护其湿地资源,提升水环境生态质量,注重蓝绿空间的协同保护;2)自然山林类位于江宁区的丘陵地带,以云台山片区、大连山-汤山片区、横山片区、牛首山组团等为代表,需要严格控制自然山林及自然风景区的生态边界,维持低干预强度,以生态保育为主;3)人工营建的郊野公园类绿地包括江宁区中部平原地区的青龙山公园等,其地势较为平缓,应以低影响开发与保护为主,控制周边用地的发展,以保障蓝绿生态本底,服务于多种生物的栖息(图 11)。

    以生态廊道连接各生态源地,南北向9条,东西向8条,形成了多线连面的生态景观空间格局。按照各生态廊道的景观类型可分为自然生态型廊道和综合型生态廊道,其中,自然生态型廊道以生态空间为主,拥有良好的生态本底和生境质量,以8号廊道为代表,对此类廊道应维持其原本的生境资源,对周边一定缓冲区范围内的区域需要采取低影响开发的建设策略;综合型廊道途经区域主要为生产和生活空间,江宁区的大部分廊道都属于综合型廊道,并具有长度较长、景观类型复杂多样的特征,包括0~7号、9~16号廊道。对于这类廊道的保护需要在识别生态夹点、生态障碍点的基础上,维护原有的生态空间并改善堵点,为生物活动预留适宜的空间(图 11)。

    结合国土空间规划用地类型与下垫面特征对江宁区生态节点(包括生态保护点和生态恢复点)进行分类,并对应图 11中的编号(表 3)。将识别出的一级夹点作为重点生态保护点,将二级夹点作为生态保护点。其中,生活与生产空间类中的生活空间需要控制人为开发强度,生产空间需根据农业开发边界予以保留,为生物预留出足够的活动空间;对于生态空间类主要采取保护、维持的措施;对于空闲地与裸土地类,则可通过转变用地、增加蓝绿空间的方式优化生境。

    表  3  生态节点分类及编号
    Table  3.  Classification and numbering of ecological nodes
    生态节点分类 生态保护点类型 生态恢复点编号
    重点生态保
    护点类型
    生态空间类 1
    生活与生产空间类 2、3
    空闲地与裸土地类 4
    生态保护点
    类型
    生态空间类 2
    生活与生产空间类 1、3、4、5、7、8
    空闲地与裸土地类 6
    生态恢复点
    类型
    居住用地类 1、5、6、11
    农业设施建设用地类 2
    空闲地与裸土地类 3、7、12、13
    交通运输用地类 4、10
    工业用地类 8、9
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    在识别出生态恢复点具体障碍区域和地物特征的基础上,采取不同程度的措施对其进行优化以提升景观连通性。保留现状用地的生态恢复点包括居住用地、农业设施建设用地、工业用地等,可采取营建渗透型绿地的方式增加生物间的能量交换,亦可在附近区域增设绿带加强廊道连通性;需要重建的生态恢复点包括空闲地与裸土地类,可将其进一步规划为蓝绿生态空间;对于交通运输用地类生态恢复点,可通过在局部设置涵洞的方式改善空间连通度。

    三生空间和生境类型的识别可为生态源地的提取及生境网络的优化提供依据。应用InVEST模型进行生境质量评价,农田可能呈现较高生态水平,但农业生产景观作为乡村特有的斑块,由于人为干扰与植被物种的单一性,并不具备作为生态源地的功能和属性,因而需要审慎甄别。本研究首先综合MSPA方法与InVEST模型,同时结合三生空间的识别结果,选择以自然生境为主的景观斑块作为生态源地,融合生态与形态作为提取生态源地的依据,通过多元要素的互补改善研究结果的或然性。其次,运用ArcGIS平台的栅格计算器区分不同的生态阻力面,采用ArcGIS平台的Linkage Mapper工具箱仿真动态生态流,模拟生境状况,进而识别生态廊道、夹点、障碍点,基于上述的定量与空间定位研究进行生境网络的整合与优化,从而提高生境保护规划的精准性。

    随着传感器及物联网应用的普及,实时采集动态数据可更为全面地反映乡村生态环境的状况,能够进一步补强数据及信息的实时性,不仅可以增强研究的时效性,同时也可以极大地提升生态环境保护规划的科学性。

    注释:
    学科限定依据WoS搜索引擎的学科分类结果,选择包含建筑、规划和景观相关的城市研究(urban studies)分类。
    学科限定按照知网搜索引擎的学科分类结果,选择包含建筑、规划和景观相关的建筑科学与工程学科分类。
    模型方法类研究作为其余5类主题的基础技术支撑,存在无法统计的多类主题的交叉内容。
    图表来源(Sources of Figures and Table):
    图 2由作者根据Citespace分析图改绘,表 1由作者根据参考文献[7],[10]~[11],[14]~[15],[21]~[74]整理绘制,其余图表均为作者自绘。
  • 图  1   国内外海岸带景观发展概况

    Figure  1.   Development overview of landscape in coastal zone at home and abroad

    图  2   海岸带景观英文文献聚类结果

    Figure  2.   Clustering results of English literature on landscape in coastal zone

    图  3   微词云语义分析及聚类结果

    注:圆形面积及其数值代表文献数所占百分比

    Figure  3.   Semantic analysis and clustering results by Weiciyun

    表  1   国内外海岸带景观研究重点内容

    Table  1   Key contents of the research on landscape in coastal zone at home and abroad

    阶段 研究类别 关键词 主要研究内容
    聚焦刚性需求 海岸带生态保护 生态空间分类 水源涵养与土壤保持、生物多样性保护、河流湿地保护与环境治理、岸线保护和海岛海岸保护与侵蚀防治等
    评价监测 生态环境承载力评价、生态网络安全格局评价、生态恢复适宜性评价和生态系统健康评价等
    优化管控 生态红线、土地利用规划等
    沿海地区环境韧性 灾害防治 海平面上升、海岸线侵蚀、海洋珍稀物种灭绝、水质污染和台风与风暴潮等
    风险响应 评估检测 侵蚀预测、海平面上升预测和人本视角风险感知
    基础设施建设 工程基础设施和自然基础设施
    空间管控 围填海管控、空间分区管控和空间划线管控等
    海岸带环境治理与管理 海岸带综合管理 发展节点 起始:以1965年建立旧金山湾自然保护与发展委员会为标志
    现代化管理新阶段:1992年联合国环境与发展大会通过《21世纪议程》
    管理重点 严格生态保护、建立健全法律法规、明确管理部门职责、鼓励公众参与、因地制宜统筹开发等
    地方特点 美国:《海岸带管理法》注重海岸带环境与资源的保护,同时加强立法管理与使用后评价的开展
    澳大利亚:强调因地制宜的灵活管理机制,赋予各州较高的管理自主权
    新西兰:关注海岸带公共活动空间属性,鼓励公众参与海岸带的建设管理过程
    欧盟:注重解决体制机制不健全带来的管理冲突问题
    中国:尚未在国家层面形成系统的理论体系和综合管理制度
    专项管理与治理 可持续渔业管理、灾害防范和风险评估与治理等
    回应人本需求 景观特征识别与评价 海景特征评价 确定三大指标类型:自然景观指标、文化与社会景观指标、感知与审美指标适用范围:海域
    海岸带景观特征
    评价
    理论缺乏,英国有少量实践尝试适用范围:陆海兼顾的海岸带区域
    海岸带公共空间品质 空间活力 海岸带活力的影响因素研判
    城市设计 人性化精细化空间发展引导、市民意愿条件价值评估、人本视角的可持续发展测算指标
    面向战略需求 国外陆海协调发展 海岸带可持续发展 陆海发展协调平衡、陆海交互作用复杂性影响应对
    空间资源利用 高效开发、避免过度开发
    规划与管理 海岸带协调陆海的双重规划管理权、未来发展限制区和动态监测反馈机制等
    经济发展 以陆促海、以海带路、统筹开发和海陆循环经济体系等
    中国陆海统筹与可持续发展 现状问题 陆海统筹海岸带界定不清晰;海岸带开发混乱;海陆经济不协调;尚未形成陆海“一张图”规划成果;管理框架与权责关系混乱
    规划研究进展 构建适用于中国的海岸带空间规划指标体系构建陆海协调度量化评价模型
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    YUAN W, CHANG Y C. Land and Sea Coordination: Revisiting Integrated Coastal Management in the Context of Community Interests[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(15).

    [2] 欧维新,杨桂山,于兴修.海岸带自然资源价值评估的研究现状与趋势[J].海洋通报,2005(2):79-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6392.2005.02.012

    OU W X, YANG G S, YU X X. Advancement of Valuation of the Coastal Natural Resources[J]. Ocean Bulletin, 2005 (2): 79-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6392.2005.02.012

    [3]

    LU S, DONG X Y, LIU Y, et al. Landscape Design Schemes for Coastal Cities Based on Marine Culture[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020: 10-14.

    [4]

    SIVAN D, WDOWINSKI S, LAMBECK K, et al. Holocene Sea-Level Changes Along the Mediterranean Coast of Israel, Based on Archaeological Observations and Numerical Model[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2001, 167 (1-2): 101-117. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00234-0

    [5]

    MCGUIRE C J. US Coastal Flood Insurance, Risk Perception, and Sea-Level Rise: A Perspective[J]. Coastal Management, 2015, 43 (5): 459-464. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2015.1051418

    [6]

    HSU T W, LIN T Y, TSENG I F. Human Impact on Coastal Erosion in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2007, 23 (4): 961-973.

    [7] 刘大海,纪瑞雪,邢文秀,等.基于人海和谐的陆海空间开发新格局构建路径探析[J].海洋开发与管理,2022,39(12):3-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2022.12.hykfygl202212001

    LIU D H, JI R X, XING W X, et al. The Path Construction of the New Pattern of Land-sea Space Development Based on the Idea of Harmony Between People and Sea[J]. Marine Development and Management, 2022, 39 (12): 3-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2022.12.hykfygl202212001

    [8] 姚远.基于潮波运动三维数值模拟的海岸带污染负荷模型研究[J].环境科学与管理,2021,46(8):95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2021.08.022

    YAO Y. Pollution Load Model for Coastal Zone Based on 3-D Numerical Simulation of Tidal Wave Motion[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2021, 46 (8): 95-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2021.08.022

    [9] 李志刚,谭乐和.海岸带生物多样性保护研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(12):260-262.

    LI Z G, TAN L H. Progress on the Conservation of Biodiversity of Coastal District[J]. China Agronomy Bulletin, 2009, 25 (12): 260-262.

    [10] 范冰雄, 李杨帆, 张雪婷, 等.海岸带区域陆海统筹生态安全“一张图”研究[J/OL].生态学报, 2023(3): 1-11[2023-01-31].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20221008.1328.020.html.

    FAN B X, LI Y F, ZHANG X T, et al. Study on the “One Map” of Integrated Land and Sea Ecological Security in Coastal Zone[J/OL]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2023(3): 1-11[2023-01-31]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20221008.1328.020.html.

    [11] 李莎莎,孟宪伟,葛振鸣,等.海平面上升影响下广西钦州湾红树林脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2014,34(10):2702-2711.

    LI S S, MENG X W, GE Z M, et al. Vulnerability Assessment on the Mangrove Ecosystems in Qinzhou Bay Under Sea Level Rise[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2014, 34 (10): 2702-2711.

    [12] 李娈启.基于地域景观特征的海滨景观规划设计[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.

    LI L Q. Coastal Landscape Planning and Design Based on Regional Landscape Characteristics[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.

    [13] 刘大海,管松,邢文秀.基于陆海统筹的海岸带综合管理:从规划到立法[J].中国土地,2019(2):8-11. doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.cn11-1351/f.2019.02.003

    LIU D H, GUAN S, XING W X. Integrated Coastal Zone Management Based on Land and Sea Coordination: From Planning to Legislation[J]. China Land, 2019 (2): 8-11. doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.cn11-1351/f.2019.02.003

    [14] 李志勇,郭庆宾.陆海统筹研究的热点与展望:基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析[J].南海学刊,2022,8(5):71-81.

    LI Z Y, GUO Q B. Research Hotspots and Prospects of Land-Sea Coordination: Analysis of Knowledge Graph Based on CiteSpace[J]. South China Sea Journal, 2022, 8 (5): 71-81.

    [15] 刘林哲,朱庆林,岳奇,等.基于陆海统筹的我国海岸带空间规划指标体系研究[J].海洋湖沼通报,2022,44(5):128-135. doi: 10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.2022.05.019

    LIU L Z, ZHU Q L, YUE Q, et al. Studies on Index System of Coastal Zone Spatial Planning of China Based on Land and Sea Coordination[J]. Marine and Limnology Bulletin, 2022, 44 (5): 128-135. doi: 10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.2022.05.019

    [16] 俞伟,关庆伟.基于文献计量学的屋顶绿化研究综述[J].中国园林,2015,31(1):74-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.01.015

    YU W, GUAN Q W. A Bibliometric Review of Green Roof Research[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2015, 31 (1): 74-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.01.015

    [17] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.

    CHEN Y, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y, et al. The Methodology Function of Cite Space Mapping Knowledge Domains[J]. Scientific Research, 2015, 33 (2): 242-253.

    [18] 侯剑华,胡志刚.CiteSpace软件应用研究的回顾与展望[J].现代情报,2013,33(4):99-103.

    HOU J H, HU Z G. Review on the Application of Citespace at Home and Abroad[J]. Modern Intelligence, 2013, 33 (4): 99-103.

    [19] 赵建保.CiteSpace可视化流程与分析范式研究[J].知识经济,2014(16):105-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3825.2014.16.072

    ZHAO J B. Research on the Visualization Process and Analysis Paradigm of Sitespace[J]. Knowledge Economy, 2014 (16): 105-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3825.2014.16.072

    [20] 周胜臣,瞿文婷,石英子,等.中文微博情感分析研究综述[J].计算机应用与软件,2013,30(3):161-164.

    ZHOU S C, QU W T, SHI Y Z, et al. Overview on Sentiment Analysis of Chinese Microblogging[J]. Computer Application and Software, 2013, 30 (3): 161-164.

    [21]

    ROCA E, VILLARES M, OROVAL L, et al. Public Perception and Social Network Analysis for Coastal Risk Management in Maresme Sud (Barcelona, Catalonia)[J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2015, 19 (5): 693-706. doi: 10.1007/s11852-014-0341-0

    [22] 王在峰.海州湾海洋特别保护区生态恢复适宜性评估[D].南京: 南京师范大学, 2011.

    WANG Z F. Suitability Assessment of Ecological Restoration in Haizhou Bay Marine Special Reserve[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2011.

    [23]

    PARK H, BYUL L D, JUNG J, et al. Variance in Natural Hazard Risk Perception in Coastal Areas[J]. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, 2017, 25 (3): 21-46. doi: 10.15301/jepa.2017.25.3.21

    [24] 朱宇,李加林,汪海峰,等.海岸带综合管理和陆海统筹的概念内涵研究进展[J].海洋开发与管理,2020,37(9):13-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2020.09.003

    ZHU Y, LI J L, WANG H F, et al. Research Progress on the Concept and Connotation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management and Land and Sea Integration[J]. Marine Development and Management, 2020, 37 (9): 13-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2020.09.003

    [25]

    VALENTE S, VELOSO-GOMES F. Coastal Climate Adaptation in Port-Cities: Adaptation Deficits, Barriers, and Challenges Ahead[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2022, 37 (1): 177.

    [26]

    SEOK-HWAN L. The Mechanism of Coastal Landscape Formation Process in Japan[J]. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 2010, 11 (10): 3974-3981. doi: 10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.10.3974

    [27] 王传胜,朱珊珊,党丽娟.辽宁海岸带重点生态空间分类研究[J].资源科学,2014,36(8):1739-1747.

    WANG C S, ZHU S S, DANG L J. Key Ecological Spaces Division of Coastal Liaoning[J]. Resource Science, 2014, 36 (8): 1739-1747.

    [28] 刘锡清.我国海岸带主要灾害地质因素及其影响[J].海洋地质动态,2005(5):23-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2005.05.004

    LIU X Q. Main Geological Hazardous Factors and Influences on China Coastal Zone[J]. Marine Geological Dynamics, 2005 (5): 23-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2722.2005.05.004

    [29] 曹忠祥,高国力.我国陆海统筹发展的战略内涵、思路与对策[J].中国软科学,2015,290(2):1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2015.02.001

    CAO Z X, GAO G L. The Connotation of and Policy Recommendation for Overall Planning Development of Land and Sea in China[J]. China Soft Science, 2015, 290 (2): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2015.02.001

    [30] 杨凤华.陆海统筹与中国海洋经济可持续发展研究:基于循环经济发展视角[J].科学·经济·社会,2013,31(1):82-87.

    YANG F H. Study on the Sustainable Development of Marine Economy in China Under Land-Ocean Overall Strategy: Based on the Development of Circular Economy[J]. Science, Economy and Society, 2013, 31 (1): 82-87.

    [31]

    EGBERTS L, HUNDSTAD D. Coastal Heritage in Touristic Regional Identity Narratives: A Comparison Between the Norwegian Region Sorlandet and the Dutch Wadden Sea Area[J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2019, 25 (10): 1073-1087. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2019.1570310

    [32] 宋军继.山东半岛蓝色经济区陆海统筹发展对策研究[J].东岳论丛,2011,32(12):110-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8353.2011.12.023

    SONG J J. Research on the Countermeasures for the Coordinated Development of Land and Sea in the Blue Economic Zone of Shandong Peninsula[J]. Dongyue Proceedings, 2011, 32 (12): 110-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8353.2011.12.023

    [33]

    GOODHEAD T, AYGEN Z. Heritage Management Plans and Integrated Coastal Management[J]. Marine Policy, 2007, 31 (5): 607-610. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.005

    [34]

    ERNSTEINS R, KAULINS J, KUDRENICKIS I. Sustainable Coastal Development Indicator System Studies in Latvia[C]//BREBBIA C A, NEOPHYTOU M, BERIATOS E, et al. The 4th International Conference on Sustainable Development and Planning. Cyprus: Wit Press, 2009: 120, 653-664.

    [35]

    RAJAKUMARI S, SUNDARI S, KAMATCHI G A, et al. Assessment of Challenges to Radhapuram Due to Temporal Coastal Infrastructures Using Hybrid Approach[J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2022, 26 (5).

    [36] 李彦平,刘大海,罗添.国土空间规划中陆海统筹的内在逻辑和深化方向:基于复合系统论视角[J].地理研究,2021,40(7):1902-1916. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200397

    LI Y P, LIU D H, LUO T. The Internal Logic and Developing Direction of Land-Sea Coordination in Land Space Planning: From the Perspective of Complex System Theory[J]. Geographic Research, 2021, 40 (7): 1902-1916. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200397

    [37] 候勃,岳文泽,马仁锋,等.国土空间规划视角下海陆统筹的挑战与路径[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(4):880-894. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220404

    HOU B, YUE W Z, MA R F, et al. Research on the Challenges and Realization Path of Sea-Land Coordination in Territorial Spatial Planning[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37 (4): 880-894. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220404

    [38]

    LI C X. Tourism Environment Quality Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[C]// IEEE. 8th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA). New York: IEEE, 2016: 870-873.

    [39] 姜忆湄,李加林,马仁锋,等.基于“多规合一”的海岸带综合管控研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(2):34-39.

    JIANG Y M, LI J L, MA R F, et al. Integrated Control of Coastal Zone Based on the Multiple Planning Integration[J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32 (2): 34-39.

    [40] 李勇,杨朋,文明征,等.海岸带“陆海空”数值模型及应用综述[J].华北地质,2022,45(3):7-15.

    LI Y, YANG P, WEN M Z, et al. Summary of Numerical Models and Applications of “Sea, Land and Air” in the Coastal Zone[J]. North China Geology, 2022, 45 (3): 7-15.

    [41]

    HERVA V P, YLIMAUNU T. Coastal Cosmologies: Long-Term Perspectives on the Perception and Understanding of Dynamic Coastal Landscapes in the Northern Baltic Sea Region[J]. Time and Mind, 2014, 7 (2): 183-201. doi: 10.1080/1751696X.2014.891915

    [42] 杨翠霞,曹福存,林林.大连滨海路海岸带美景度评价研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(8):59-62.

    YANG C X, CAO F C, LIN L. Study on the Scenic Beauty Evaluation for Coastal Landscape in Dalian Binhai Road[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2017, 33 (8): 59-62.

    [43]

    MCKINLEY E, PAGES J F, BALLINGER R C, et al. Forgotten Landscapes: Public Attitudes and Perceptions of Coastal Saltmarshes[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2020, 187 (C): 105117-105117.

    [44] 王宝,高峰,王金平.海岸带综合管理研究新趋势及其对我国的启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2015,37(1):105-109. doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2015.01.020

    WANG B, GAO F, WANG J P. Trends on Study of Integrated Coastal Zone Managementand and Its Enlightenment to China[J]. World Science and Technology Research and Development, 2015, 37 (1): 105-109. doi: 10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2015.01.020

    [45]

    SCOTT D B, GREENBERG D A. Relative Sea-Level Rise and Tidal Development in the Fundy Tidal System[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1983, 20 (10): 1554-1564. doi: 10.1139/e83-145

    [46]

    WALTON T L. Coastal Erosion-Some Causes and Some Consequences-(with Special Emphasis on State of Florida)[J]. Marine Technology Society Journal, 1978, 12 (4): 28-33.

    [47] 黄惠冰,胡业翠,张宇龙,等.澳大利亚海岸带综合管理及其对中国的借鉴[J].海洋开发与管理,2021,38(1):28-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2021.01.005

    HUANG H B, HU Y C, ZHANG Y L, et al. Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Australia and Its Reference to China[J]. Marine Development and Management, 2021, 38 (1): 28-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2021.01.005

    [48] 王丽丽,魏正波,徐一剑等.我国沿海地区应对气候变化的空间管控方法研究[J].规划师,2021,37(4):11-16.

    WANG L L, WEI Z B, XU Y J, et al. Spatial Control of Coastal Area in Response to Climate Change[J]. Planner, 2021, 37 (4): 11-16.

    [49]

    ZHANG X L, GU D Q, LI Y K, et al. Research on the Principles, Methods and Process of Community Participation of Protection of Coastal Wetlands in Jiaozhou Bay[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2007 (4): 135-143.

    [50] 江曲图,何俊昱,王占山,等.基于LUR/BME的海岸带地区PM_(2.5)时空特性研究[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(2):424-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2017.02.004

    JIANG Q T, HE J Y, WANG Z S, et al. Spatiotemporal Analysis of PM2.5 in Large Coastal Domains by Combining Land Use Regression and Bayesian Maximum Entropy[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37 (2): 424-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2017.02.004

    [51] 章海波,骆永明,刘兴华,等.海岸带蓝碳研究及其展望[J].中国科学:地球科学,2015,45(11):1641-1648.

    ZHANG H B, LUO Y M, LIU X H, et al. Research and Prospect of Coastal Blue Carbon[J]. China Science: Earth Science, 2015, 45 (11): 1641-1648.

    [52] 董跃,姜茂增.国外海岸带综合管理经验对我国实施“陆海统筹”战略的启示[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2012(4):15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-335X.2012.04.003

    DONG Y, JIANG M Z. The Experience Learned from Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Implementing the Strategy of Land and Sea Integration in China[J]. Journal of China Ocean University (Social Science Edition), 2012 (4): 15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-335X.2012.04.003

    [53] 范学忠,袁琳,戴晓燕,等.海岸带综合管理及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2010,30(10):2756-2765.

    FAN X Z, YUAN L, DAI X Y, et al. The Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) and Its Progress[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2010, 30 (10): 2756-2765.

    [54]

    GEORGIA H, DA SILVA ARTURO R, JON H, et al. Utilizing Marine Cultural Heritage for the Preservation of Coastal Systems in East Africa[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10 (5): 693. doi: 10.3390/jmse10050693

    [55]

    BENEDET L, FINKL C W, KLEIN A. Morphodynamic Classification of Beaches on the Atlantic Coast of Florida: Geographical Variability of Beach Types, Beach Safety and Coastal Hazards[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2006: 360-365.

    [56] 彭建,王仰麟,刘松,等.海岸带土地持续利用景观生态评价[J].地理学报,2003(3):363-371. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2003.03.005

    PENG J, WANG Y L, LIU S, et al. Landscape Ecological Evaluation of Sustainable Land Use in Coastal Zone[J]. Journal of Geography, 2003 (3): 363-371. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2003.03.005

    [57]

    ZHAO L L, FAN X C, HE D J. Landscape Changes and Their Socio-Economic Driving Factors in Coastal Zone[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2021, 30 (5): 4855-4869. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/133240

    [58] 王春叶.基于遥感的生态系统健康评价与生态红线划分[D].上海: 上海海洋大学, 2016.

    WANG C Y. Ecosystem Health Assessment and Ecological Red Line Division Based on Remote Sensing[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2016.

    [59] 张绪良,张朝晖,苏蔚潇.黄河三角洲海岸带生态承载力综合评价[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(6):364-369. doi: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2015.06.075

    ZHANG X L, ZHANG Z H, SU W X. Comprehensive Assessment of the Ecological Carrying Capacity of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15 (6): 364-369. doi: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2015.06.075

    [60] 应超,高扬,汪海峰,等.陆海统筹背景下海岸带复合系统协调发展水平及影响机制研究:以温州市为例[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(10):1899-1912. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.10.010

    YING C, GAO Y, WANG H F, et al. Coordinated Development Level and Mechanism of Influence of Coastal Zone Complex System Under the Background of Land-Sea Coordination: A Case Study of Wenzhou City[J]. Progress in Geographic Science, 2022, 41 (10): 1899-1912. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.10.010

    [61] 管松,刘大海.美国海岸带管理项目制度及对我国的启示[J].环境保护,2019,47(13):64-67. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2019.13.014

    GUAN S, LIU D H. Review of the United States Coastal Zone Management Program and Its Enlightenment to China[J]. Environmental Protection, 2019, 47 (13): 64-67. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2019.13.014

    [62] 王冠钰.澳大利亚的海洋法实践研究及其对我国的启示[D].中国海洋大学, 2010.

    WANG G Y. Research on the Practice of Ocean Law in Australia and Its Enlightenment for China[D]. Ocean University of China, 2010.

    [63] 王小军.论海岸带综合管理:国际经验与中国实践[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,52(7):79-89.

    WANG X J. Integrated Coastal Zone Management: International Experience and Practice of China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 52 (7): 79-89.

    [64] 王泉力,李杨帆.新时代生态环境建设中陆海统筹发展对策研究:以厦门为例[J].中国环境管理,2018,10(6):87-91.

    WANG Q L, LI Y F. Integrated Land-Marine Management for the Eco-environmental Development in the New Era of Xiamen, China[J]. China Environmental Management, 2018, 10 (6): 87-91.

    [65] 陈克亮,高宇,吴侃侃,等.我国海岸带综合管理制度、实践及存在问题[J].应用海洋学学报,2022,41(3):524-532. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.2095-4972.2022.03.017

    CHEN K L, GAO Y, WU K K, et al. Integrated Coastal Zone Management in China: System, Practices and Problems[J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography, 2022, 41 (3): 524-532. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.2095-4972.2022.03.017

    [66] 韩丕龙.填海新区海岸带景观生态化建设[D].山东: 山东大学, 2014.

    HAN P L. Ecological Construction of Coastal Landscape in Reclamation New Area[D]. Shandong: Shandong University, 2014.

    [67] 张蕊.特征评估视角下滨海景观风貌识别及保护研究[D].大连: 大连理工大学, 2021.

    ZHANG R. Research on Coastal Landscape Style Recognition and Protection from the Perspective of Feature Assessment[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2021.

    [68] 邹开敏.滨海游憩机会谱的构建和解析[J].广东社会科学, 2014(4): 47-51.

    ZOU K M. Construction and Analysis of Coastal Recreation Opportunity Spectrum[J] Guangdong Social Sciences, 2014 (4): 47-51.

    [69]

    YIN Y T, SHAO Y H, LU H L, et al. Environmental Drivers of the Vital Urban Coastal Zones: An Explorative Case Study Based on the Data-Driven Multi-method Approach[J/OL]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.962299/full.

    [70]

    LIAO S S, XIE Y Z, XIAO F. Study on Urban Design of Coastal Tourism Areas[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 106 (sp1): 372-376. doi: 10.2112/SI106-086.1

    [71]

    XU Z. Optimization Design of Public Space Structure in Coastal Cities Based on Interactive Design[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, 104 (sp1): 751-755.

    [72]

    HALKOS G, MATSIORI S. Environmental Attitudes and Preferences for Coastal Zone Improvements[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2018, 58: 153-166. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2017.10.002

    [73] 张赫,叶昊儒,王倩,等.新时期海岸带空间资源保护利用形势下的用海人口内涵研究[J].海洋开发与管理,2020,37(9):22-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2020.09.004

    ZHANG H, YE H R, WANG Q, et al. Study on the Connotation of Sea Population Under the Situation of Coastal Space Resources Protection and Utilization[J]. Marine Development and Management, 2020, 37 (9): 22-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2020.09.004

    [74] 李建春,高玉婷,曲衍波,等.陆海统筹视域下国土空间多维冲突识别与分区调控:以莱州市为例[J].地理科学,2022,42(7):1155-1165.

    LI J C, GAO Y T, QU Y B, et al. Multi-Dimensional Conflict Identification and Zoning Control of Land and Space in the Perspective of Land and Sea Coordination: Taking Laizhou City as an Example[J]. Geographic Science, 2022, 42 (7): 1155-1165.

  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 杨磊,许金华,向守乾,赵阳. 海岸建筑退缩线划定管理的探索与实践——以珠海市情侣路海岸带为例. 城市规划. 2024(04): 4-12 . 百度学术
    2. 何昊翰,许先升,黄铃. 基于KANO模型的海口市建成区滨海公共空间景观需求评价. 广东园林. 2024(04): 51-59 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

图(3)  /  表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  107
  • HTML全文浏览量:  14
  • PDF下载量:  34
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-01-31
  • 修回日期:  2023-03-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-14
  • 刊出日期:  2023-05-09

目录

/

返回文章
返回