CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”

城市公园绿地碳汇能力影响因素的网状荟萃(Meta)分析

Network Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Carbon Sink Capacity of Urban Park Green Spaces

  • 摘要:
    目的 城市公园绿地为人类提供与健康福祉密切相关的多种生态系统服务,具备生态、社会、经济多重效益,其碳汇能力受多个影响因素控制。综合评估多个因素对城市公园绿地碳汇能力的影响,以此探讨低碳城市公园设计策略的最优解。
    方法 以“碳汇”“公园”等为关键词进行文献检索,使用网状荟萃(Meta)分析对城市公园绿地碳汇能力的不同影响因素进行系统性定量评估,并根据其影响大小进行分类统计。通过基于网络证据图的影响因素重要性评估、基于联赛表的相对影响能力分析、基于累积排序概率曲线下面积(surface under the cumulative ranking curves, SUCRA)图的综合影响能力分析,综合评估不同影响因素对城市公园绿地碳汇能力的实际作用,并结合亚组分析和漏斗图评估研究样本的异质性、误差及偏倚。
    结果 共检索952篇文献,纳入50篇有效文献,提取34个城市公园绿地碳汇能力的关键影响因素,划分为设计形态、生境组成、种植方式、管护形式、外部环境五大聚类。其中,设计形态和管护形式对于提升城市公园绿地碳汇能力效果稳定,适用性较强,是提升碳汇能力的基础因素;生境组成和种植方式在特定场景下提升碳汇能力效果显著,但受场地特征限制;外部环境对城市公园绿地碳汇能力的直接影响较弱。
    结论 城市公园绿地碳汇能力受多种因素共同作用,在以碳汇为导向的设计方案中,应优先考虑优化设计形态和管护形式,根据场地实际条件灵活调配不同的生境组成和种植方式,并适当考虑外部环境的影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This research mainly aims to identify the primary interactions between the factors influencing the carbon sink capacity of urban park green spaces and recognize the most effective landscape design strategies, thereby providing a foundational data set for the further development of a repository of lifecycle design strategies for urban green spaces. In light of the increasingly prominent role of urban green spaces in mitigating climate change, the research also seeks to highlight strategies that balance ecological functions with urban recreational and aesthetic needs.
    Method This research employs the network Meta-analysis method to explore the critical factors influencing the carbon sequestration potential of urban park green spaces, and conduct a systematic quantitative assessment of their respective carbon sink capacity. The research categorizes and statistically analyzes various factors currently involved in relevant research that affect the carbon sink capacity of urban park green spaces, whose interactions and cumulative impacts are assessed using the network Meta-analysis method. The Meta-analysis incorporates network evidence plots, league tables, and SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curves) to evaluate the ranking and relative importance of different factors. Additionally, heterogeneity, bias, and errors are examined through subgroup analyses based on park scale (a), functional characteristics (b), and climatic conditions (c), accompanied by the evaluation of publication bias using funnel plots.
    Results The analysis in this research involves 50 eligible literature articles published between 2000 and 2024, which are selected from a total of 952 articles initially collected. The research identifies 34 influencing factors, categorized into five distinct clusters: Design characteristics, habitat composition, planting strategies, maintenance methods, and external environment. The research results emphasize the multidimensionality of carbon sequestration in urban parks. Design characteristics and maintenance practices emerge as the most stable and broadly applicable factors. Their SUCRA values rank the highest, reflecting their consistent contribution to carbon sequestration across diverse settings. For instance, controlling the proportions of grasslands and pathways at 20% and 30%, respectively, and optimizing carbon storage while maintaining recreational value. Maintenance practices often act on other influencing factors to enhance carbon sink capacity, such as using native tree species, selecting natural materials, and designing low-maintenance sites to reduce the cost of maintenance. Habitat composition and planting strategies show significant influence under specific scenarios. Fast-growing tree species with large-canopy demonstrate strong initial carbon sink capacity, while subsequent maintenance, including pruning, is essential to sustain long-term benefits. Conversely, habitat composition reveals high heterogeneity, particularly influenced by tree density and vegetation diversity. Planting methods also hold significant importance in enhancing the carbon sequestration of urban parks, such as multi-layered vegetation structures that enhance carbon sink capacity but require careful adjustments to avoid excessive shading and competition, thereby achieving more efficient carbon sequestration. The influence of the external environment on carbon sink capacity is generally weaker but still requires attention in specific scenarios. The geographical location, climatic conditions, and soil types of different parks also lead to certain differences. Subgroup analysis by climate type shows that the research objects dominated by temperate climates show higher heterogeneity, presumably because the longitudinal differences of the research objects in temperate regions are large, and the differences in plant species and ecological environments lead to large differences in the measurement results of carbon sink capacity.
    Conclusion This research provides critical insights into the interplay of factors shaping the carbon sink potential of urban parks, emphasizing the importance of stable foundational strategies like design and maintenance. While habitat composition and planting strategies offer substantial localized benefits, their variability necessitates tailored interventions informed by specific ecological and social contexts. To advance urban carbon neutrality efforts, future research should integrate these findings into practical tools, such as enhanced modules in landscape performance platforms. These modules should allow for lifecycle assessments that account for design, construction, and maintenance phases, thus supporting real-time monitoring and optimization. Additionally, leveraging human-machine collaboration through intelligent workflows can further enhance decision-making by combining real-time data analysis with human expertise. Future research should expand the assessment system for the composite factors influencing the carbon sink capacity of urban park green space, so as to fill the data gaps in the research on carbon sinks of parks under special ecological environments, and further enrich the data used.

     

/

返回文章
返回