CN 11-5366/S     ISSN 1673-1530
“风景园林,不只是一本期刊。”

国家游径系统的设计指引与运维模式探析——以横贯加拿大游径为例

The Management, Operation and Design Guidelines for National Trail System: A Case Study of Trans Canada Trail

  • 摘要:
    目的 中国正加快构建以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系,而长距离、多用途、多目标的国家级线性游憩空间的建设意义重大,但面临诸多挑战。通过探究横贯加拿大游径(Trans Canada Trail, TCT)的实践经验,为中国国家游径系统的建设和发展提供参考。
    方法 系统梳理TCT的相关法规政策及项目报告,结合数据统计和实地调研,探析其游径分类体系、设计方法、可持续效益评估要素和运营管理模式,总结其在全国范围内构建共同愿景和高度连通性的策略。
    结果 TCT采用复合的分类依据与分类指标,实施差异化管理,向使用者传递更加清晰的游径信息,以帮助使用者选择恰当的游憩方式。实地考察的案例展示了TCT的环境适应性设计方法。对TCT的可持续效益量化评估增强了政府与公众对游径建设的支持力度。TCT运营管理的突出特征包括以非营利机构主导的多元主体协同模式及公众责任保险。
    结论 结合中国国情和公众需求,提出大尺度游径连通性、运营管理体系复合性、统一指南规范建设和可持续评估体系共4类可借鉴经验。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Guided by the principle of advocating harmonious coexistence between humans and nature, linear recreational spaces have become significant places for people to explore and connect with nature. Currently, China is actively promoting the establishment of a natural reserve system centered on national parks. Building a system network of long-distance, multi-purpose and multi-target national trails faces various challenges. Therefore, it is necessary to draw experiences and lessons from regions with more mature outdoor recreation and trail system. As the second largest country in the world in terms of land area, Canada has successfully established a national trail system. Although its practice can bring us very valuable insights, it has been relatively understudied.
    Methods This study takes the Trans Canada Trail (TCT), one of the world’s longest systems of multi-use recreational trails, as its primary case. Initiated in 1992, TCT has stretched over 29,000 km from the Atlantic to the Pacific to the Arctic oceans, through every province and territory, linking over 15,000 communities. It draws on relevant legislation, policies, and guidelines issued by responsible agencies, as well as official reports. Combining geographic information analysis with field investigations, it explores the planning, construction, and management practices of TCT. It focuses on the goals, standards and system for TCT’s classification, the universal accessible strategies, and the design of its signage system. The photos of field investigation demonstrate how different sections of TCT are designed to adapt to their various contexts. The study also explored how quantitative assessment of sustainable benefits could help enhance government and public support for the trail development. It also highlights four key characteristics of TCT’s operation model, namely the non-profit leadership, the collaborations among multiple stakeholders, financial sustainability, and ensuring public safety.
    Results The TCT employs a composite classification approach that communicates trail information more clearly and helps users make better-informed decisions. It adopts a standardized framework based on Trail Management Objective (TMO), allowing for systematic evaluation of how well a trail’s physical design parameters align with its intended management goals, and enabling targeted management strategies. The surface and nodes of the trails are designed to adapt to their respective contexts, with distinct configurations tailored to natural, rural and urban settings. TCT’s universal accessibility is supported by physical design, users’ participatory design methods, and information services, as well as design guidelines and digital mapping tools used to establish a coherent signage system. Independent organizations have conducted quantitative evaluations of the economic, social, and environmental benefits of TCT to demonstrate its sustainability. The findings reveal that TCT can enhance the common vision of the nation, which helps TCT gain stronger support for its development and management from government agencies and the general public. The operation model of TCT is led by a non-profit organization, relying on the collaborative governance of the federal government, local authorities, communities, enterprises and indigenous people, which is the approach to address the challenges posed by fragmented land ownership and a complex social landscape. The sources of funds for the development and maintenance of TCT are relatively extensive. Although federal funds take up the major portion, more than one-third of the budget comes from other sources, such as private donors. These resources are mainly allocated to trail construction and maintenance, as well as outreach activities and volunteer participation. A sound financial audit and the financial system’s transparency are essential to sustain TCT’s operation. Furthermore, the public liability insurance is required to help reduce the operational risks and costs for the management entities.
    Conclusion Facing numerous challenges, including vast territory, fragmented land ownership, complex environmental contexts, and the lack of a unified federal legal framework among others, one of the world’s longest national trail systems has been successfully established across Canada, with a nationally shared vision and high connectivity. Its practical experience enables us to gain meaningful insights. In the process of establishing a national trail system, China still faces several critical challenges that require immediate resolution: the absence of a cross-regional coordination mechanism has led to fragmentation in management; insufficient systematic policy guidance and technical standards hinder the improvement of trail system’s quality; over-reliance on government funding makes it difficult to establish a sustainable long-term investment mechanism; a scientific evaluation system has yet to be developed to achieve a dynamic balance between ecological conservation and social development; and effective public participation and multi-stakeholder collaboration mechanisms remain challenging to implement. The suggestions are listed as follows: 1) Establish a cross-regional collaborative governance mechanism, to enhance connectivity for large-scale trails, and to help connect China’s rich cultural and natural heritage; 2) Adopt a composite operational management system and a multi-stakeholder cooperation mechanism, and improve diversified funding mechanisms; 3) Formulate unified trail guidelines, to leverage the guiding and unifying role of trail guidelines to promote cross-regional design and maintenance cooperation; 4) Establish a sustainable evaluation system through quantitative assessment, to support multi-dimensional coordinated development of trails.

     

/

返回文章
返回